Social pullback from Start-up dream

Start-up dream is now-a-days seen by many youngsters but not everyone ends-up with his /her start-up.

I happen to know a youngster, who passed out in 2015 from a prominent southern private engineering college. Let’s call this youngster Pranav. He has been active in college fest, organizing activities for “societies” and getting “tech-app” made from his juniors. Highly connected with students, professors and evangelists from other colleges in the area, he had a dream to commence with his own start-up and even had firmed-up his ideas on technology and domain to venture into. On campus placements, he rejected four such offers, including from the big Indian IT companies and consulting MNCs. He knew, for sure, the challenges he was likely to face in his start-up. Usual ones were finding a team with same zeal and passion as he had, funding it, getting the product ready, competing against competition, sustaining the various ups-and-down of a startup and then making it big to succeed. He graduated and was ready for all of these challenges.

He was ready but his family was not. He has discussed the options with his parents before rejecting his campus placement offers, but parents were under pressure from the “society”. Few relatives were skeptical of his choice in life and were not seeing the vision and life he was seeing for himself. Anyone, Pranav or his parents discussed the idea with, brought the rejection of the start-up idea in favor of more established options of higher studies (post-graduation) or taking up a job.

Pranav isn’t along. There are numerous graduates, hailing from middle-class, who are facing challenges even before starting their own venture. The society in India is yet to reconcile to what’s-the-big-deal-to-failure mentality. Is it a big blow if someone fails in an experiment? What about the learning from such a failure?

I did a simple arithmetic of the options that are available to be engineering graduate, soon after college.

Please allow me to exclude the outliers from IIT and IIM.

Based on latest figures, an engineering graduate gets about Rs 3 – 3.50 lakhs as his starting salary. Assuming everyone, who gets into a job gets an increment of 25% in the year 2 and 3 appraisals, 20% for the next two and 15% subsequently, as the base salary is growing and this percentage reflect the general 60% of the candidates who fit in the middle of the bell-curve. An engineering graduate gets about 11 Lakhs after about year 9, unless he reskills himself or switches jobs too frequently, with a cumulative earnings of Rs 61 Lakhs after 9 years of service.

			25%	25%	20%	20%	15%	15%	10%	10%
	Option	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Year 4	Year 5	Year 6	Year 7	Year 8	Year 9
1	Job, Right now	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
			7	11	17	24	32	41	50	61	Cumulative
2	Higher Edu India - PG (2 Years)	(5)	(5)	7	8	10	12	13	15	16
			(10)	(3)	5	15	27	40	55	71
3	Higher Edu Abroad - PG (2 Years)	(20)	(20)	10	12	14	17	19	21	23
			(40)	(30)	(18)	(4)	13	32	53	76
4	Startup - Failed, Join Job after 2 years	(20)	-	15	18	22	25	29	31	35
			(20)	(5)	13	35	59	88	119	154
5	Startup - Successful	(20)	-	40	48	58	66	76	84	92
			(20)	20	68	126	192	268	352	444

Consider the same graduate going for higher post-graduation studies within India. He invests about 10 Lakhs in the fees and hostel and gets to start at about Rs 7 Lakhs. Assuming the same increment percentages as earlier, his CTC at year 9 is at 16 Lakhs, with cumulative earnings of 71 Lakhs over 9 years of service. If the same graduate had gone for higher studies abroad, he had to invest about Rs 40 Lakhs an would have been much better taking CTC of Rs 23 Lakhs (cumulative 76 L) after the same period.

Consider starting a venture. What does it take for founders to start a venture and take it to a level recognized in the industry? He needs to build product (technology savvy), understand market dynamic including competition (marketing plan with branding), define go-to-market strategy (led sales), arrange funds (CFO role), hire and retain people (CHR role), manage organization growth, address regulatory compliances, etc. If this venture has made its presence, founders have learnt which no other course in the world can teach them! Innovative and modern outlook companies are constantly looking for such people who are not only all-rounder, but also possess fighting spirit and attitude to solve problems as they come. It makes these founders in-valuable, whether they lose out on their venture or make success out of it. Anyone who fails still has a better market value and conservatively valued at 15 Lakhs as starting salary, if he had to resume job after venture failure. Not to mention, he is better off than any of the earlier discussed cases, even if he has burned about Rs 20 Lakhs of his own.

What if he succeeds? There is no looking back. What one earns is un-comparable to job that could have given. Pranav has been able to convince his parents to travel on this path.

If one argues higher education in India or abroad provides connect with fellow batch-mates and this can be leveraged for better opportunities in life. This is no-doubt a take away. However, this is much more explicit had one started his venture.

It is also pertinent to mention that business is not for everyone. Only some have the aptitude and attitude to take the risk and have the endurance to undergo the hard work physically and emotionally. So, for all those we are appropriate for it, startup venture is the right way to go.

It is time that as parents we support our wards to take the path less traveled and enable them to be the torch bearer for the generation to come, without compromising self-interest.

Ashish Jain

www.thestartupboard.com

About Author - Ashish mentors founders of start-ups on strategy

Get top talent in a Start-up. Here is how.

Person with an idea, entrepreneurial zeal, passion and perseverance can commence with a new venture, with or without some like-minded friends. This initial team will take the venture only a distance, beyond which a team at the CXO level is needed, complementing the skills of the founders. Most ventures, till they become celebrated ones, struggle to attract the top talent, creating a vicious circle of top talent makes the venture celebrated or vice-versa.

To understand how to attract top talent at CXO level, it is important to understand what turns them down. One of the largest studies undertaken ever, by the Gallup organization, surveying over a million employees and over 80000 managers, finds relationship with the boss being the primary reason for dissatisfaction and leaving. “People leave Managers not companies” is the key message by its authors Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman. Other studies reveal reasons in that order, include unchallenged and boring work, financial opportunities elsewhere, not felt to be contributing to organization’s business goals, without autonomy and independence, without clear strategic direction, unfit in the organization culture with the level of politics, nepotism and policies.

This does not mean anyone fit for a big organization is fitter for a startup. Those with lack of risk taking ability will not join the startup. People without passion to create or help solve a problem will most likely stay away.

People, who are willing to join the startup, will primarily join if they distinctly see the career path in the organization in comparison to an established company. Risk may be higher and calculated, but it needs to show the prospects what it would do to their career if venture hits high. Offering equity on milestone achievement is the most resorted to. Ventures keep a fixed allocation of equity to be offered to employees partaking risks for growth.

Financial stake is not the most important factor. Career progression out of achievement of fulfilling venture’s goals, recognition in the start-up eco-system and naturally, increased market value of the person, all contributes to fan the individual’s inert feelings in making it happen. Such an environment can possibly happen only when it is transparent, plans are big and challenging, owned-up, and are given with freedom to execute. Failure is only a lesson for course correction and not for finger pointing.

To me, here are the top reasons why top talent will join a start-up

1. Founders to have clear and big vision - Vision of the founders is an important energizer, background and intention of the founders as exhibited in the assessment discussions, is often a deal maker or breaker, as both sides assess the other. Big responsibilities offered to CXO candidates are a big attraction for them to consider the position. 
2.  Transparency between founders and CXO candidates - A heart-to-heart talk is extremely important between founders and the candidate. Both sides must be frank in admitting the constraints and document them. Founders will be skeptical to take candidates, who color themselves more aligned or are referenced by the investors. 
3.  Open and intuitive organization culture – Exciting and intuitive work environment, open-door policy, lean organization structure, transparency and equality in information reach, promotion of entrepreneurial instincts, tolerance to failure, incentivizing to learn, fun at work are some traits that make conducive work environment like in Google and IDEO. 
4. Financial stability in a short run – Funded with promotor or angel money, the venture should be able to sustain for a year. This assurance is important to candidates who will need time before proving themselves worth running it. 
5. Flexibility, flexibility and flexibility – Rarely business plans work the way they were conceptualized in the beginning. Flexibility of the founders to adapt to changing situations, flexibility of the senior team in changing course and flexibility of investors to back the venture come the changes, is the key. 
6. Low ego – People from corporates, many times come with huge ego. Work at a start-up may not be conducive in massaging this high ego, either of the founders or of candidates. Humility is the key in making the work and relationship successful. 
7. Don’t pay the peanuts – Most motivated and self-initiated individuals value money not among the top 3 reasons to join a company. Though, they do not want to negotiate every now and then and must feel to be satisfied with the package they have joined at. Good talent knows its value and must get it, to deliver without distractions.

Communication of existence of such an environment to attract the right candidates is still a task, which “The best job in the world” campaign in a popular competition by Tourism Queensland, promoting Great Barrier Reef, attracted many able candidates inexpensively.